Plain of Dura
About Plain of Dura
Plain of Dura is the open ground in the province of Babylon where King Nebuchadnezzar II set up an image of gold sixty cubits high and six cubits broad, roughly 27 metres by 2.7 metres (Daniel 3:1). The name occurs only in that verse. The Aramaic form Dura is generally traced to the Akkadian word duru, "wall" or "walled enclosure", a common element in Mesopotamian place names, and the Old Greek (Septuagint) version rendered it with a word meaning an enclosed area, while Theodotion's Greek version transliterated it as Deeira. The plain is the stage for the account of the fiery furnace rather than a town in its own right, and no ancient source outside Daniel refers to this plain by that name.
Biblical Account
Nebuchadnezzar summoned the satraps, prefects, governors, counselors, treasurers, justices, magistrates and every provincial official to the dedication of the image, and they stood before it on the plain (Daniel 3:2-3). A herald commanded all peoples, nations and languages to fall down and worship when the horn, pipe, lyre, trigon, harp and bagpipe sounded, on pain of being thrown into a burning fiery furnace (Daniel 3:4-6). Certain Chaldeans then accused Shadrach, Meshach (Mishael) and Abednego, whom the king had set over the affairs of the province of Babylon, of refusing to serve his gods or worship the image (Daniel 3:8-12). Their answer to the king, their deliverance from the furnace and their promotion in the province fill the rest of the chapter (Daniel 3:16-30). The chapter gives no year; the events fall somewhere within Nebuchadnezzar's reign, 605 to 562 BC.
Geography and Identification
The text places the plain "in the province of Babylon" (Daniel 3:1), which sets it in the Babylonian homeland rather than in a distant dependency. Beyond that the location is uncertain, and the identification is debated among biblical archaeologists and commentators. Three lines of proposal have been made. The first, and the most often repeated, comes from the French Assyriologist Jules Oppert, who during the French expedition to Mesopotamia in the early 1850s recorded a small stream called the Dura joining the Euphrates some 6 or 7 miles below Babylon, and a group of mounds named Tulul Dura ("mounds of Dura") about 12 miles south southeast of modern Hillah. One of these mounds, el Mokhattat, is a square mass of unbaked brick, reported as about 14 metres (45 feet) on each side and 6 metres (20 feet) high, which Oppert took to be the pedestal of the golden image itself. Nothing beyond the name and the platform ties the mound to Nebuchadnezzar's dedication, so the claim about the image's base is speculative even if the general district is possible. A second proposal reads Dura not as a separate locality but as the duru, the great outer rampart, of Babylon itself, so that the "plain of Dura" would be flat ground enclosed by or lying beside the city wall; on this view the assembled officials stood close to the capital. A third line looks to towns of similar name elsewhere in Babylonia: Theodotion's Greek version wrote Deeira, apparently identifying the plain with the Babylonian town Der (also written Deru or Dur ili) toward the Elamite frontier, and a town Duru near Erech has also been suggested; both lie well away from Babylon, and commentators generally set them aside because the text keeps the scene within the province of Babylon. Places named Dura near Carchemish and near Apollonia beyond the Tigris, mentioned by the Greek historian Polybius, are ruled out as lying outside the province of Babylon or too far from the capital.
Archaeology
The sources consulted here report no excavation of Tulul Dura beyond Oppert's survey, and the pedestal claim remains unverified. What the archaeology of Babylon does supply is context: Nebuchadnezzar's stamped bricks, building inscriptions and excavated palace and processional way show a king who built and dedicated monuments on a large scale, which is the setting the dedication in Daniel 3 assumes.
Theological Significance
The plain is the setting in which royal power demanded worship and three exiles from Judah refused it in the open, before every rank of the Babylonian administration (Daniel 3:12). Their answer, that God is able to deliver but that they would not serve the image even if he did not (Daniel 3:17-18), and the king's own confession afterward that no other god can rescue in this way (Daniel 3:29), give the otherwise unremarkable plain its lasting importance.
OT in Context is a biblical geography and archaeology platform grounded in conservative evangelical scholarship and rigorous archaeological standards. Content reflects peer-reviewed archaeological consensus and a Reformed theological framework.
Explore Plain of Dura in Context
See Plain of Dura on the interactive map, explore who controlled it across centuries, and ask questions with the Context Engine.
Open in OTIC →Free to explore. No account required to get started.
Historical Significance
Plain of Dura holds significant importance in understanding the historical and cultural context of the biblical world. As a geographical location mentioned in Scripture, this place provides crucial insights into the ancient Near Eastern world where biblical events unfolded. The historical significance of this location extends beyond its biblical mentions to include its role in ancient trade routes, political boundaries, and cultural exchanges that shaped the region. Key themes associated with this topic include: babylon, daniel, exile, idolatry, site-identification-debated.
Biblical References
Plain of Dura is mentioned in several biblical passages, providing multiple perspectives on its significance in Scripture. The primary biblical references include: Daniel 3:1, Daniel 3:2-3, Daniel 3:4-6, Daniel 3:8-12, Daniel 3:16-30, Daniel 3:12, Daniel 3:17-18, Daniel 3:29.
These scriptural mentions help establish the historical and theological importance of Plain of Dura within the broader biblical narrative. Each reference provides unique insights into how this element fits into God's unfolding plan and the historical context of the ancient world.
Studying these passages in their original historical context enhances our understanding of both the immediate circumstances and the broader theological implications of the biblical text.
Scripture References:
Archaeological Evidence
Archaeological research has provided valuable insights into Plain of Dura and its place in the ancient world. Excavations and surveys in this region have uncovered evidence of ancient settlements, fortifications, and artifacts that help confirm and illuminate the biblical accounts. Modern archaeological methods, including satellite imagery, ground-penetrating radar, and stratigraphic excavation, continue to reveal new information about this location.
The field of biblical archaeology continues to evolve, with new discoveries regularly adding to our understanding of the ancient world. These findings not only support the historical reliability of biblical accounts but also enrich our appreciation for the complexity and richness of ancient Near Eastern civilizations.
Related Topics
Discover More
Explore Plain of Dura and hundreds of other biblical locations, events, and figures in our interactive application.
Launch Interactive AppYou're looking at the data.
In the app, you see how it fits — mapped, timed, and cross-referenced with everything else in Scripture's world. Explore it for $1.
Try Pro — $1 for 7 days